Use Your EQ Profile to Choose One Listening Behavior

What should the profile help you notice?

Use the private 32-item Emotional Skills Profile to find a question that matters in your next one-to-one, not a label for yourself. It separates summaries of recent behavior from judgments about responses to authored scenarios. If the profile draws your attention to understanding others or responding to them, connect that area to a moment you expect to face: a colleague explaining a setback, asking for input, or raising a concern.

For instance, if you often move quickly into problem-solving, the useful question might be whether you understand the concern before offering a fix. That is narrower than “Am I a good listener?” and it gives the profile a practical role: helping you choose where to look. A scenario response can suggest what you believe is effective; a recent-behavior response can suggest what you tend to do. Neither tells you what the upcoming conversation will require. If the profile points to a broad area rather than a clear habit, keep the question open until you picture the actual exchange. A cue should be relevant to what the colleague brings up and within your control; you do not need to force a chance to demonstrate it.

What can you actually observe in a one-to-one?

Choose a cue that fits the conversation you have in mind. If the relevant moment is a colleague describing a problem, you might summarize the central point before offering a solution. Your observation is whether you made that summary at that moment. The aim is not to deliver a scripted line or to treat one technique as the whole of listening.

A 2023 workplace listening review synthesized 144 studies, analyzing 664 effect sizes from 400,020 observations. It describes paraphrasing, reflecting feelings, and asking open questions as verbal signals, while explaining that people judge listening from several verbal and nonverbal cues together. The review found links between perceived listening and work outcomes, but much of the evidence was observational and 75% of the literature relied on self-reports. In practice, a paraphrase can help check whether you understood, yet its timing and relevance still matter. If the colleague is asking for a decision or needs space to finish, summarizing too soon may miss the point. Pay attention to the handoff: has the colleague finished, and is a summary useful before your reply? That small boundary makes the action easier to remember while leaving room to respond differently when the conversation calls for it.

Sources: A Meta-analytic Systematic Review and Theory of the Effects of Perceived Listening on Work Outcomes

How do you turn the profile into a small practice plan?

Before the meeting, write a cue tied to a likely opening: “When my colleague finishes describing a concern, I’ll summarize what I heard before suggesting a fix.” This makes the practice specific to your profile reflection and the next one-to-one. It also separates a useful opportunity from a forced attempt: if no concern comes up, there was no occasion to try this particular behavior.

Afterward, make a private note of whether the moment arose and what you did. A sentence is enough: “Concern came up; I summarized first, then checked whether I had it right.” If you offered advice immediately, note what was happening in the exchange rather than turning the moment into a pass or fail. The detail may help you choose a better cue next time, such as waiting through the colleague’s full explanation. You can include the topic or time pressure in the note if it changed what felt possible. Keep the record brief and for your own reflection; it is not a rating of the colleague or a measure of your EQ.

A meta-analysis of 138 randomized studies involving 19,951 participants found that monitoring interventions increased goal attainment on average, with stronger effects when progress was recorded or reported. Those studies covered varied goals and settings; they did not test listening practice or this profile. They offer general support for making an observation concrete, not a prediction about what will happen in your conversation.

Sources: Does Monitoring Goal Progress Promote Goal Attainment? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence

What would count as useful evidence after the conversation?

Your note tells you what you recall doing. If the relationship and timing make it appropriate, a focused question can add the other person’s perspective: “Did my summary capture the part you wanted me to understand?” A correction gives you something specific to learn from; it is not a general rating of your listening. You can also leave the question unasked when it would interrupt the conversation or put the colleague on the spot. If you do ask, make it easy to correct you, then listen to the answer without asking for reassurance. The point is to find out whether your summary matched their meaning, not to secure praise for trying.

Workplace emotional-skills training research gives broader context for development, not a verdict on this exercise. A 2024 review included 50 studies in its pre-post analyses and 27 controlled trials. It reported average improvements in measured emotional competencies, alongside high heterogeneity and low methodological quality. The interventions and measures varied, and the review did not evaluate this profile or whether summarizing before advice changes a particular one-to-one. If a structured private prompt would help you choose a question to carry into that conversation, explore the Emotional Skills Profile at /assessment.

Sources: A Meta-analytic Systematic Review and Theory of the Effects of Perceived Listening on Work Outcomes; Training emotional competencies at the workplace: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Questions readers ask